DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7O1S. CQURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
CRS
Docket No: 6088-13
1 May 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your |
application on 6 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted is
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. mo :
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 December
2012, On 6 February 2013 you received: nonjudicial punishment
for wrongful use of drugs.
On 1 March 2013 your ‘commanding ‘officer recommended that you be
separated with an uncharacterized entry level separation by
reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After review by the
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was
approved and on 30 April 2013 and you were separated with an
uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of misconduct
due to drug abuse. You were assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
Since you have been treated no differently than others in your
situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of your -reentry code. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and vetes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
‘ipheepeard reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
‘material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
(ee
ROBERT D. k—
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0732 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. On 6 March 2013, you were diagnosed with hepatitis B which existed prior to your enlistment and recommended for administrative separation. The Board noted that an RE-3E is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4380 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. You were then notified that you were being administratively separated due to: erroneous enlistment (drug abuse). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3278 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2014. On 12 November 2013 you were so @ischarged and assigned an RE-37 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12182-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded, however, that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct, there is no basis for any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4371 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,-together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07435-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2011. The reentry code assigned by the Navy is not binding upon the other services, which are free to accept or reject an application on the basis of ‘their own standards# If another branch of service decides to ‘waive your reentryt code and accept you for enlistment, the Navy will not object. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2924 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on.the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03619-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11757 12
In this regard, there is no evidence in your record, and you provided no evidence, that your processing documents were falsified. The Board found that a reentry code of RE-4 is authorized by regulatory guidance in cases such as yours and is often assigned to service members separated by reason of a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2333 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, whéH applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...